Dangerous Ideologies VIII: Multiculturalism, the Elite’s Wild Card and Trojan Horse

Company CEOs arrive at the White House in Washington, October 2, 2013, for a meeting of the Financial Services Forum with U.S. President Barack Obama. Pictured are (L-R) Lloyd Blankfein, chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs, Robert Benmosche, president and CEO of American International Group (AIG), Keith Sherin, chairman and CEO of GE Capital, and Douglas Flint, group chairman of HSBC Holdings.REUTERS/Jason Reed (UNITED STATES – Tags: POLITICS BUSINESS)

Within the darkened labyrinths and hidden institutional tunnels, there has gangrened one of the most furtive and sly ideologies of our contemporary world. Strangely, this ideology only seems to breed inside Western European countries and in the Americas. And like most modern ideologies, it carries a wholesome, rational, progressive face. I have even seen Anarchists support this institutional nonsense glazed over with poisoned sugar.

During one of my past, forsaken lives, I lived as an ex-pat in Europe. And like most English native speakers, I taught English classes. I performed this easy work in order to pay rent in a shared apartment, sleep in my own bed, cook my own food, take showers when I wanted, use a personal toilet, and generally, enjoy my European existence. I also needed some personal traveling funds. It was not a bad life really.

I simply took away decent work from the local natives who actually spoke English quite well. The cowboy outfit, scam language academies where I had worked preferred native English speakers. It was all fine with me, in that I lived in Europe as an illegal alien with particular privileges.

I looked like the natives, so I could pass – unlike the illegal Africans, mixed-racial caste Latin Americans, and other Asians. For those darkened ones, every day was a dangerous walk into the vicious obstacle course of illegal work – or possibly, a sudden police stop, asking for papers, jail time, and then a morose deportation to their original continents.

I fell in love with the European life and mentality. I started to speak their languages quite well – and I even began to think like them. As an ex-pat American, I sort of fit into the Euro-lifestyle. There were some things that impressed me greatly about European life, and there were other cultural issues that troubled me at the same time.

Europe, unlike America, had a long, deep and violent history. Their cultures had deep historical pockets to past millennium, while the United States was a young colonial-settler state. Our European-American structures, which had still somehow survived the ravages of time, traveled the farthest back to the late 1600s.

Most European regions partook of a common language and a common history, a type of shared culture of values, behaviors, artistic expressions and social activities. This shared culture united the rural towns with the larger cities, the agricultural worker class with the industrial workers, the artisans with the journeymen. Each region slanted toward a certain religious tradition, whether Catholic Christian, Protestant Christian, Orthodox Christian or Sunni Muslim. There was also a lot of atheism that abounded.

Every European region had its cultural prototype, where one could see, feel and point at definitive representations of each European subgroup, or people. There was no question about this. As an outsider, I was happy to experience this cultural power. It felt great to enamor oneself and embrace a new culture.

The sophisticated visitor could even grab a new soul through loving the language and the history of the place where he or she was residing. I always renewed my tourist visa through visiting friends in non-EU Switzerland.

While living in those different parts of Europe, I also saw many other visitors or residents that did not represent the nation or its people. They were actually from other parts of the world. In most parts of Europe, and even in the eastern parts, the urban society was heavily multicultural. One could find foreign populations from every corner of planet Earth inside Europe’s megalopolises.

My European friends regularly complained about this over-diversity of foreign populations. But I also understood from history that the European powers of Britain, France, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Denmark-Sweden, Italy, Germany and the Netherlands had invaded and colonized the rest of the planet. They all introduced the violence of the modern state and capitalism to the rest of the Earth. Did not the ex-colonized poor have a right to search for work in the metropolises of Europe?

In Spain, I noticed large foreign populations of North Africans and Latin Americans, while in France, I saw many North Africans, Sub-Saharan Africans and Levantine Arabs. Britain contained many South Asians, West Indians or Afro-Caribbeans, Mesopotamian Arabs, East Asians and Sub-Saharan Africans; meanwhile, the Netherlands had a good amount of Malays and Afro-West Indians. Italy possessed populations of both North Africans and East Africans, and in Portugal there was an overabundance of Brazilians and Sub-Saharan Africans. The former colonized had effectively colonized the home countries. Quoting the Christian Bible, those former European colonial powers have simply reaped what they had sowed.

But I also noticed that many European nation states had allowed in foreign peoples, where the European Metropolis had never colonized in the first place. A good example was Switzerland. I was shocked to see in its large cities, faces and peoples from all over the world. Another example was in the Netherlands, which had one of the largest foreign populations of Moroccans within its borders. France and Spain colonized that country, not the Netherlands.

When I asked my European friends about those different nations living inside their own nations, they all told me that they were refugees. A refugee implied a political refugee, or person in danger of violence, through some corrupt state apparatus, often due to their ethnic origin, religion or political persuasion.

The European Union countries, and to lesser extent, Canada and the US, have had to accept a certain number of these refugees from across the globe, due to some UN precedent. In the case of the Amerikan Empire, they usually accepted refugees from the same countries that the Empire had already invaded, or where they had already murdered a substantial percentage of that country’s population, such as Latin America, the Philippines, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and most recently, Mesopotamia.

I also noticed a peculiarity of the refugee life, and especially in particular northern European countries, such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Britain, France, Denmark and Sweden. It was obvious that those same refugees were actually enjoying the good life.

The states or governments of those countries paid for everything in the refugee’s lives. The state gave them a minimal salary, yet they did not have to work. The state also gave them decent housing that they didn’t have to look for. If they got sick, they received state health care for free, and if they had children, they could send them to the free state schools!

Living as a political refugee in those countries ensured a type of social parasite-aristo lifestyle – easy money and no work whatsoever. The refugee could simply hang out in the local cafes, go out to eat, shop for cheap clothes, and just live the relaxed life.

Meanwhile, the regular citizens had to go to work and look for housing – and pay their taxes, which funded the same refugee lifestyle. What was going on? This unjust system rightly angered the regular citizens of those countries. I even felt a pang of jealousy. Could I possibly become a political refugee from America, so I could receive such marvelous economic benefits?

The most perplexing concern of the refugee aristo lifestyle revolved around the fact that Europe’s entire political class supported this system. From the Conservatives to the Social-Democrats to the Euro-Communists, they all continued to fund this system, and at the same time, legalize the refugee-immigrant situation, and even allow other, completely unrelated refugees or immigrants to enter their countries.

During a visit to Barcelona, I was shocked to find that in one of its central medieval neighborhoods, called Raval, there was a large community of Pakistanis. Britain colonized Pakistan, not Cataluña. After living in Europe for a few years, I would soon learn the truth involving the state-elite ideology of Multiculturalism.

Multiculturalism is the State’s and the Elite’s greatest Wild Card and Trojan Horse against its own native populations. Why would the State and Elites manage such nefarious methods?

First, the State and Elites literally hate their own populations. As Mikhail Bakunin, the Anarchist intellectual, wrote so eloquently, even the most open minded radical, once he or she takes political power, begins to hate his or her subject populations. She or he believes that the political elites, which they now belong to, knows what’s better for the citizens.

Multiculturalism also enables an easier transition to rule. It is much easier to rule over a divided population than a united one. The best forms of political division is cultural disunity. If France was multicultural during its revolutions of 1789, 1830 and 1848, would they have had successful revolutions? The last so-called revolution was 1968 – and it failed miserably. Divide and Conquer is still the best State method in ruling over and destroying the opposition.

Another good example comes from Amerikan imperial history. What was the most dangerous historical point for the US Government, during its entire history from 1790 until today?

The US Civil War, or the War between the States, was the most dangerous period for the Amerikan Empire. A culturally united South, or the Confederate States of America, almost defeated the Union Army. It’s moral laws, unity of purpose and thick, homogenous culture ensured a continual struggle for four long years of military-spiritual struggle. Even the anti-Secessionist Southerners understood the Southern Cause, and sympathized with their Secessionist brethren.

For the brutal political-economy of Global Monopoly Capitalism, the top elites who run the pyramid schemes love Multiculturalism. This ideology allows a massive reserve army of labor, both illegal and legal, such as those visitors using student-worker visas to work at the former job positions of the natives – all for lower wages and with less economic rights. Multiculturalism shoves the unemployed natives into hating the illegals, while hiding the face of their true enemy – capitalism.

If the illegal immigrants or foreign visa people complain about their lack of rights on the job, then the owners will quickly fire them – and in the case of the illegals, refer them to the proper authorities. Foreign workers are a cheaper and more compliant workforce. Under the loaded gun of Capitalism, profit always remain supreme.

Our political-economic elites do love a divided and demoralized, multi-cultural reserve of wage slaves. Yet, they do not want their children attending the same schools with such social vermin.

If the so-called ‘close the border’ politicians truly wanted to stop illegal immigration, they could implement one simple decree. Whatsoever business, multinational to small proprietorship, which hires illegal immigrant workers will have their private property confiscated. This decree would put the whole illegal immigration problem to rest. Would the elites do such a thing – never.

Our Leftist mortal enemies defend Multiculturalism as a more progressive future for the country. Yet, most immigrants, both legal and illegal, are not interested in furthering a new progressive agenda. They are actually quite conservative. Most of them want to work as independent contractors and make some decent money. At the same time, they have to socially interact with their fellow compatriots inside of a foreign land. We would all do the same thing if we were in their situations. While I lived in Europe as a permanent tourist, my best friends were other Americans.

Multiculturalism is not a grassroots movement. It is the State and the elites who are responsible for the mass movements of peoples, also permit mafias to direct the movement peoples across the globe, and then regulate the human mass populations within national parameters.

Most heinously, Multiculturalism gives the State an untapped military force against both domestic and foreign enemies. During the recent Amerikan imperial invasions of Mesopotamia and Central Asia, the US Military needed more troops for their legal assassinations, so they browbeated desperate Latin American immigrant populations in order to hand over their young men for cannon fodder. Military service for the Empire gives full citizenship rights – whether the recruit returns dead or alive.

We Anarchists, who are also natives within our respective countries, must maintain our mental guards, so that we don’t join or support the Fascist political blocks that blame all of their problems on the others, while pushing hatred and violence against the foreign immigrants and visitors. Nor should we join in the traps of the Leftists, agitating for open borders or for the complete political-economic rights of all illegal residents.

The State gives nothing without some ulterior motives – either for control or for fear. All States and Elite rulers need potential mercenaries, whether political, economic or military. The State will also demand some form of compliance within the segments of the population who possess precarious legal privileges. Multiculturalism hands the State an American combo plate, piled with game pieces. Multiculturalism is just another fine tool for the State’s furtive methods in divide and conquer.

 

The State and Capitalism are Violence – You can never reform them

A Fine Benin Bronze Plaque In High Relief With A Warrior Chief, Full Length, In Elaborate Battle Dress With Shield And Lance. Circa 1600.

Some truths manage to brand themselves within the inner sanctums of the human mental condition.

Yet these same truths also have their deniers. We would like to deny those particular truths because they are the recurring nightmares of history. The truth is real, but we some how hope… Are there not exceptions to the everyday, sacred laws of existence?

One such historical truth concerns the evils of the State and its sordid Political-Economy. In Ancient History, there were some exceptions to that Historical Rule of Barbarity – but within our Modern-Contemporary world, the exceptions have all but disappeared. The cruel actuality of our existence has exposed the Truth’s putrid venom.

At one time in the Sahel of West Africa, whipped the brush, and scented-blinding winds of imperial glory – which also included tribute taxations, violent conquests, extensive householder slavery, and a wealth in bullion where the prosperous Islamic merchants of Baghdad would even bow their knees in glory.

The decade was the 1230’s AD. The great Pagan Empire of Ghana was losing its power to the glorious Muslim armies of the Almoravid Empire, which had already reconquered Spain, Andalus, for Dar-Al Islam. A vision came upon the political leaders of the Malinke Nation concerning a new imperial creation. The leader of destiny was Sundiata Keita.

He established a disciplined army of strong Malinke soldiers who allied with other tribute nation warriors. This great army had marched onward to war. Through his tactics and discipline, he won both the battles – and the final war.

Malinke then established an even greater Empire in the Sahel, from the semi-deserts of North Africa, all the way to the tropical forests of West Africa, later called Mali.

Many Empires have decayed after their first conquests, since the ancient warrior-leaders often neglected their original successions and recent conquests. But not this Empire – as the years passed, the Mali Empire seemed to expand and increase into even greater political distinction.

The Empire ruled over the river commodity exchanges of the Niger and the Wangara. The Mali Kingdom received massive tributes in gold, human slaves, tributary soldiers and salt.

This Empire understood that a successful ancient empire must tax human migrations, labor, armies, hard currency and spice-foodstuffs, all in order to control the surrounding cultures. This empire controlled so much land that only the Mongols in the northeast had conquered more territories. Soon, Europe, Africa and Asia heard of the fantastic stories concerning its wealth and massive army.

The emperors, or Mansas, like the Mongols later in history, converted to the religion of Islam. But this was not a strict regimen. A type of syncretic religious system developed where West African rituals and native myths mixed with Islamic world culture, all of which fused into a new cosmopolitan civilization, headquartered in the magical city of Timbuktu. Timbuktu would later possess a massive university system for Islamic scholars and intellectuals.

A hundred years later, the great Mansa Musa took the throne, and he decided to perform a great pilgrimage to Mecca. He would travel with his elite soldiers, harem entourage, slaves, exquisite food – and his gold, through the Sahel and the Sahara. This pilgrimage of power and piety had thus become Historical Legend.

All the senses exploded upon urban Islamic civilization. Mansa Musa ate sumptuous meals flavored with the exotic herbs and spices of West Africa. His servant slaves were armed and had powers too. They acted more like family then humiliated peons. All of his entourage, including his slaves, wore fine clothes of leisure and sensuality. Their deep colors represented the magical Earth of orange-blue African sky, and the dry Sahel yellow ochre-green savannahs salad, mixed with tropical green-brown, pasta strewn forests. Their weapons of war seemed like works of art – even though they could maim and kill with gentle ease. But it was the overall, carefree existence of that royal entourage, in truly holding such wealth, yet not boasting of it, nor showing it off.

Musa gave generously to all religious institutions on his spiritual path, while the merchants of the great Islamic cities stood in the awe at the generosity and nobility of such an emperor. Mansa transformed into a type of mystical Sun King bursting upon the Earth from the Heavenly Golden Palace.

At that same time in history, the Europeans were suffering from the horrible effects of the Bubonic Plague, which had already killed a third of its population. They failed to see their own dirtiness and hypocrisy, and so they looked in askance. Those dirty Europeans would return to Africa with a vengeance however.

But like always in the sordid annals of human history, the cusp of imperial greatness also leads to the slow and painful decline and fall – to eventual extinction. Another one hundred and thirty years later, one of Mali’s tributary states had successfully revolted and conquered Timbuktu.

This empire was the Islamic West African Kingdom of Songhai. The Songhai supported the intellectual life of the university at Timbuktu however, while they had succeeded in capturing the tributary taxes of the previous Malian rulers.

Unfortunately, the Malians tried to enlist the devious Europeans in their desire for continued power and glory. They chose the Portuguese maritime seafarers in order to further their reconquest. This became a terrible omen, for it was the Portuguese maritime empire that first established the mass murder system of the African Slave Trade in the mid 1400s.

Meanwhile, other African nations wanted greatness for their own kingdoms, such as the Wolof, the Hausa, the Benin and Ashanti. To the east, existed the Muslim African Empire of Kanem-Bornu. The Europeans discreetly understood the devious applications of Divide and Conquer.

This imperial history of West Africa perfectly explains the nature of the Ancient State. West African Kingdoms sought their power bases through family dynasties, tribute taxations, a political economy of patron slavery, and a warfare-conquest spoils system.

Most of the subject people were farmers and artisans. The wars rarely touched them. One Empire came, and then another dynastic authority took its place. And such was the bittersweet cycle of life. The new King shone bright, only to die unto History’s dust.

The Ancient state and political-economic systems of tribute tax-paternalism were not necessarily brutal. Even Alexander the Great did not willfully murder whole populations of cities, nor did he target entire ethnic-religious groups for mass extermination.

The Judeo-Christian Monotheists, i.e. the Israelites of Numbers, Deuteronomy and Joshua, and the Medieval Christian Crusaders were the first ancient mass murderers or paleo-Nazis.

Yet, the ancient stories of the West African Empires fully explain the modus operandi of the State and its political-economy, always based on the power of one group over another.

Power is simply the legal rights to use violent methods for whatever reasons found necessary, which include intellectual and economic forms over subject populations. As the modern intellectual Max Weber wrote, the State always holds the final means for a total monopoly of violence. Or as we Anarchists proclaim: the most dangerous, violent criminals are State actors and their economic elites.

Yet the modern state has transformed into a wholly different, and much deadlier, rabid animal-monster. When Capitalism and its brutal profit motives invaded the daily life of humanity, during the 19th century; something in the State Sadist changed drastically – and for the worse.

A perfect historical example that exposes the criminality of the modern State is the so-called Risorgimento, or the forced unification of the Italian States during the 1860s.

The 1860s represented another violent decade across the human globe. In Japan the Emperor Meiji successfully destroyed the Tokugawa Shogunates and the Daimyo gangs ruling over the Japanese populace. The Second German Reich birthed through continual wars against its weaker neighbors: Denmark, Austria and France. The British Empire invaded and subdued the Bhutanese in South Asia. The Russian Emperor eliminated the Serfdom system, while the American Empire invaded, subdued and committed atrocities against the white South, or the Confederacy, while liberating the African-American slaves – yet giving them nothing to live on! The French Empire invaded and subdued Mexico, while three Latin American countries: Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay joined together in a War of Extermination against the Paraguay Nation.

But there was one invasion that most historians completely forgot during that same historical period. A royal-aristocratic gang of social parasites, using a bunch of Liberals as the public face of the movement, invaded another royal-aristo stronghold, and then murdered a substantial part of the rural population who had refused to give allegiance to the new bosses.

The royal house of Savoy, who spoke better French than Italian, allied with another local aristo, named Count Cavour, all of whom were located in a region of northern Italy, called Piemonte-Saboya. Those crooks came up with an ingenious plan to continue their corrupt political rule. They surfed on the Euro-Nationalist wave, and later transformed their juntas of soldier-thugs into the Italian National Army.

Those men were not stupid. In order to give a noble veneer to their wicked deeds, they publicly used Italian Nationalist-Liberals for the public face of the movement. They chose two notable Liberals: Giuseppe Mazzini who represented the political wing, and Giuseppe Garibaldi who represented the military wing.

No war is complete without a violent invasion, and so this ugly cabal from the north of Italy attacked another degenerate royal-aristo base in the southern part of the country, ruled by the Spanish Bourbon parasites, called the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies.

This was not just a fight between two different Euro-parasites for the control of a new country. The Piedmont-National Army also conducted mass murder across the rural country of southern Italy in order to fully subdue any resistance to the new kings. This Northern Army murdered around 100,000 southern Italians. This early counterinsurgency program worked quite splendidly, and so, the new National government in Rome annexed the southern peninsula. But war always leaves its scars of loss, anger, hunger and poverty.

Whole regions in the South lost valuable men and the almost self-sufficient farmers lost portions of their lands. The National Government allied itself with the local Southern aristos, carpetbagger politician-elites from the north, and the Camorra-Mafia gangs – to fully control the wealth of the region.

The Great Italian Emigration began from the South to the North of the country, to northern Europe, and across the globe, mostly to the Rio de Plata of South America and to the United States, in order to look for work. Still to this day, in Modern Italy, the North and Rome accuse the Southerners of weakening Italy’s greatness.

This is what the modern state and its economic elites do to modern peoples. Unlike the ancient states, they don’t just invade, amass two armies for battle, scale the walls, and then retake the palace, they also commit mass murder exterminations against civilian populations, or an act of total war against a subject population.

Why do they do this? Because our Modern Lives have lots of non-State media sources: printed publications, theaters and public spectacles. The Modern State demands that all subjects not just respect it, like a good gang leader – but also fear its criminal power of destruction. Fear works even better for the complete social control of subject populations.

The Modern State with its full monopoly of violence and legal crime always demands the center stage, the center of national attention. The National Official History is the history of its own appropriated, great leaders. National Culture is its own appropriated lies and state propaganda babble, often relayed through boring, school-university textbooks.

Do any of us still believe that a mass murderer-serial rapist will somehow transform himself or herself, and suddenly become a nice and respectful person? So then why do we continue to believe such criminal institutions, the State and their economic elite enablers, will all of a sudden reform themselves and reject the monopoly of violence.

Let all attentive subjects awake to the ides of History.